On July 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution for violating the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act at the Daegu District Court on July 20, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 28, 2012.

1. On November 201, the Defendant and C, D, E, and F received benefits while working in a company normally, and concluded a lease contract for an apartment apartment to live in Korea, and concluded a lease contract for an apartment to live in Korea with the need for security deposit, and thereafter, the Defendant and C, D, E, and F received a loan for workers from financial institutions, and offered loans by cancelling the lease contract immediately, and the Defendant introduced the loan owner E to F. The Defendant introduced the loan owner who became aware of through D.

On December 6, 2011, the Defendant made it easy to move by entering the vehicle E, etc., and around December 7, 201, F made an apartment to purchase the G Building 101 Dong 1909, Daegu-gu G Building 101, and provide it as a leased object, and around December 7, 2011, E made a false employment certificate, salary statement, and insurance policy certificate as if E had been paid while working normally for the company even though he had not worked for the company as “H”. On December 8, 2011, E submitted a false employment certificate, salary statement, insurance policy certificate, etc. to the employee in charge of the bank at the sexual branch of the victims bank of the Daegu-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government, Seodong-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, to request for the “loan for Workers’ House Lease Loan” to the employee in charge of the bank at the sexual branch of the victim bank.

On December 9, 2011, the defendant et al. continuously purchased through an auction, without any intention to lease or rent the "G building 101 Do 1909," which he purchased through an auction, prepared a false lease contract as if F leases the apartment to E for two years from the deposit money of KRW 100 million, and as if E resides in the apartment, the defendant et al. subsequently transferred the resident registration as if E reside in the apartment.