beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.08.25 2016고단2315

사문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the new contract on mobile phone services in C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On September 24, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for the crime of forging private documents at the Incheon District Court on February 19, 2016, and the above judgment was finalized on April 6, 2016, and was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for the crime of forging private documents at the Incheon District Court on April 6, 2016, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 4, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant, without authority, made a false statement on the forgery of a private document on a new contract for mobile phone service in the name of D and the event of the aforementioned investigation document at the “F store” store around December 29, 2014, around December 24, 2014, that he/she would identify the Defendant of D who visited the above store G with a false statement of the fact that he/she would visit the said store G around December 24, 2014, he/she would have the said G prepare the customer information column for the application for membership using a stamper on the new contract paper, and in the automatic payment account column, “the bank: the Saemaul Treasury/Account number: H,” “D” in the customer name column, “D”, “the date of birth,” and “D” in the name of the customer,” and “D” under the name of the user(s)/(s)/(s) and 1) of the new mobile phone service contract under the name of the original user(s).

2. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same place as described in paragraph 1, submitted to G employees of the victim F a false contract for the mobile phone service under the forged name, such as described in paragraph 1, to which he/she was aware of the fact, and acquired by the victim’s 94,000 won from his/her place of damage by obtaining one mobile phone of 6 flus cell phones from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Recording of witness D and G respective statements in the second public trial records;

1. An application filed on December 29, 2014 for J-based mobile phone subscription in the name of J-based mobile phone;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: inquiry of criminal history, reporting of the previous convictions in the disposition, and reporting of the results thereof (A);