When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 16, 2014, the Defendant borrowed 14 million won from the victim E Co., Ltd. in order to purchase a car by obtaining a loan from D (Seoul building C) from the victim E Co., Ltd., and set up a mortgage on automobile commuting with the purport of paying 14 million won and 526,732 won per month during 36 months, but the Defendant offered the said vehicle as security by borrowing 3.5 million won from the credit service provider, whose name is not known at the office of office of Goyang-si, Yongsan-si, Busan, on July 15, 2014.

As a result, the defendant was unable to discover the location of the above vehicle which was set up a collateral security, thereby obstructing the victim's exercise of rights on the mortgage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a complaint;

1. Relevant Article 323 of the Criminal Act and Article 323 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;