However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 11, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act from the Ulsan District Court.

피고인은 2019. 11. 15. 19:46경 울산 울주군 B시장 부근 도로에서부터 울산 울주군 C 앞 도로에 이르기까지 약 1km의 구간에서 혈중알코올농도 0.181%의 술에 취한 상태로 D 팰리세이드 승용차를 운전하였다.

As a result, the Defendant violated the regulations on the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual survey report and on-site photographs;

1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, and the statement of the situation of drinking drivers;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports on criminal records, investigation reports (Attachment to judgments on criminal records of the same kind);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation, community service order and order to attend the course of the punishment under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act are to be determined as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the accused has led to the instant crime and has been repented; (b) the accused has a record of drinking driving three times; and (c) the accused has a record of blood alcohol concentration and alcohol level; (d) the distance and age of drinking alcohol driving; (e) the age; (e) character and conduct; (e) the motive, means and consequence of the offense