However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant is a person engaged in the driving of a two-wheeled vehicle with BCR110 wheels in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving

On October 28, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.114% among blood transfusions on October 28, 2016, and led the above vehicle to proceed along the two-lanes in the direction of the upper distance from the remote distance of the road to the upper distance of 1482-day elementary school as Seoul Gangdong-gu, Gangdong-gu, Seoul.

At the time, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and prevent accidents in advance by driving a vehicle with the driver's duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting this and making it difficult to drive a car normally due to influence of drinking, was negligent in driving the two-lanes of the foregoing two-lanes of the previous road and driving the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the previous road ( South, 58)

D Launaly, the back part of the taxi vehicle was driven by the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim C, such as light salt, tensions, and tensions, which requires approximately three weeks’ medical treatment by occupational negligence as above, to the victim E (the victim South, 33) who is the passenger of the above damaged vehicle, for approximately two weeks’ medical treatment. In addition, the Defendant suffered the injury, such as dysium and tensions, and hys’ salt ties, etc.

2. Defendant 1 driven a B-wheeled vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.114% in blood, from a road where it is impossible to identify not more than twice in the same time as the above 1st paragraph of the Road Traffic Act, to identify about 3 miles-dong in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from a road where it is impossible to identify about 1482, as the Gangdong-gu, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, to the front day of the first day of the first day of the day in Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. C and E written statements;

1. A report on internal investigation, a report on the detection of a driver engaged in primary investigation, and a driver engaged in primary investigation;