On November 5, 2016, around 17:16, the Defendant: (a) took care of the victim’s face at one time by drinking the victim’s face; (b) put the victim’s face over the floor by putting the victim’s name into arms, and putting the victim’s face into the floor, and put the victim’s face against the victim’s treatment days on the victim’s face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged parts of pictures (D) and CD 1;

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the grounds for sentencing under Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act for the choice of criminal facts;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment [the scope of the recommended punishment] on the sentencing criteria, general injury (the scope of the recommended punishment] shall be limited to the mitigated area (two months to one year) (the special mitigated person]; and

2. Determination of sentence: The defendant in April has been sentenced to punishment for the same kind of crime, and the defendant in April has not been aware of the fact that he/she committed the crime of this case even though he/she was under the suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime, and it is inevitable to punish the defendant significantly.

However, considering the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case as well as the fact that the victim's injury seems to be relatively minor, the circumstances favorable to the defendant are determined as follows: (a) comprehensively considering the defendant's age, environment, sex behavior, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and all of the sentencing factors indicated in the records and the theory of changes, such as the circumstances after the crime, the punishment is determined as ordered.