However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On November 5, 2012, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million from the Suwon District Court’s House to a fine of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On March 5, 2013, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Chungcheong District Court’s Chungcheong Branch.

【Criminal Facts】

On May 30, 2014, at around 19:20, the Defendant driven a 1 ton class vehicle owned by the Defendant under the influence of alcohol 0.070% of the blood alcohol concentration without obtaining a driver’s license from around 4km section of approximately 5818 in front of the mutually influence-dong in the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do to the same west-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of the control of drinking driving, report on the status of driving under drinking, and report on the status of driving under driving under drinking;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the standing report on driving without a license, and driver's license inquiry;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (the punishment imposed on a violation of the Road Traffic Act of heavier punishment);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and order to attend a lecture is a case where a defendant drives a motor vehicle without a driver's license, and the defendant again commits the crime despite the fact that the defendant had been able to have been punished due to drinking driving, etc., and the risk of repeating a crime seems to be high since he/she owns the motor vehicle as it is, there

However, considering the fact that the defendant is recognized to commit a crime and is against the defendant, there is no criminal record exceeding the fine, and the amount of drinking alcohol is relatively high.