On January 8, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor in the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch, and completed the execution of the above punishment on March 3, 2015.

1. On November 20, 2015, at around 07:10, the Defendant: (a) found the entrance and exit of the victim D (n, 83 years of age) located in Pyeongtaek-gun, Gyeonggi-do on the ground that the opening scam scambling from the entrance and exit of the victim D (n, 83 years of age) was scambling; (b) caused the damage to the scam of the entrance, the victim was scamed on the floor with the unscam of the market value, which is the victim’s possession in front of the entrance.

2. Around 07:20 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was frighting a fright, such as shouldering the fire at the above place; (b) was asked by the police officer F of the E police box affiliated with the 112 reported and sent to the site; (c) was asked by G about the circumstances of the instant case; and (d) the above police officer: (a) was aware of the fact that he was punished several times due to interference with the performance of official duties; (b) was frighting the fright fright, fright fright fright fright; (c) frightened the face of the F on one occasion; and (d) assaulted the F’s face at one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A H statement;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry into criminal history, application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation report (verification of the period of repeated crime and attachment report, etc. of the same criminal records);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes have history of having been already punished several times due to violence, damage to property, interference with the execution of official duties, etc., and each of the crimes of this case was committed during the period of repeated crime due to the previous conviction in the judgment.