However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 14, 2013, the Defendant was under investigation by the Sungdong Police Station due to the fact that he was not out of C’s house, and around April 30, 2013, the Defendant was notified of the instant case, and he was going to the Sungdong Police Station located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul on May 1, 2013.

However, around 02:45 on May 1, 2013, the Defendant paid taxi expenses to taxi workers and trial expenses as a matter of taxi charges, and the Defendant paid taxi expenses to the police station of the Seoul Dong-dong Police Station of the Seoul Dong-dong Police Station of the Republic of Korea, which was on guard duty at the Jungdong Police Station of the Seoul Dong-dong Police Station of the Republic of Korea.

After that, the defendant took a bath to the above D who was working in the first place in the Seoul Eastdong Police Station, the first place in the Seoul Eastdong Police Station (hereinafter referred to as the "Seoul Eastdong Police Station") and sent D's chest part once.

As such, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officers related to D's guard duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Investigation report (Investigation of CCTV data recorded in front of the Seoul East Police Station);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to police officers' photographs and CCTV photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;