The evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 7, and 8, seized, from the Defendants.

Defendants are people with no specific occupation.

피고인들은 2016. 7. 19. 경 ‘ 위 챗’ 채팅앱을 통해 성명을 알 수 없는 사람( 일명 ‘H’ )으로부터 소위 보이스 피 싱 사기’ 인출 책 제안을 받고, 그의 지시에 따라 타인 명의 계좌로 송금된 사기 피해 금을 인출하여 위 성명을 알 수 없는 사람에게 송금하기로 공모하였다.

1. 전자금융 거래법위반 피고인들은 2016. 7. 20. 경 서울 종로구 대학로 120 지하철 혜화 역 부근 커피숍에서 대기하던 중, 위 성명을 알 수 없는 사람으로부터 ‘ 위 챗 ’으로 지시를 받아 커피숍 인근 주택 우편함에서 I 명의의 새마을 금고 체크카드 (J), 농협카드 (K), L 명의의 기업은행 체크카드 (M), N 명의 기업은행 체크카드 (O )를 수령하고 ‘ 위 챗 ’으로 비밀번호를 확인하였다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to keep access media for the purpose of using them for crime.

2. On July 20, 2016, the Defendants received a waiting order from a person whose name is unknown, to the account of the Cze Card until the cash is deposited.

Around that time, another Bosing staff member who cannot know his name is an agent of the Hyundai Savings Bank P, by posting a phone to the victim G.

Since it is possible to lend 3.5 million won of the existing loan of the Korea Asset Savings Bank, it is false to say that the legal team account is deposited. Accordingly, from the victim, 3.5 million won was remitted from the company bank account ( Q) connected to the above L on the same day at around 12:08.

At around 12:40 of the same day, the Defendants withdrawn 3.49,000 won from the cash payment period using the check card in the above R’s name at the 136-56 new bank branch office in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with those who are not aware of their names and were issued 3.5 million won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ 1.