상해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On July 7, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on November 1, 2015.
【Criminal Facts】
1. On August 2, 2017, around 04:10 on August 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the main point of “D” operated by the Victim C (year 37) in Seo-gu, Gwangju; (b) together, the Defendant was unable to avoid a small amount of 20 minutes, due to the following: (c) the Defendant, while drinking alcohol and having a frightly conflict with that of a friend; (d) booming the victim’s body; (d) booming the part of the victim’s right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right
In this way, the defendant interfered with the main operation of the victim by force, and caused the victim's injury that the victim is unable to know the number of treatment days, and damaged the property owned by the victim.
2. On August 2, 2017, the Defendant illegally used resident registration numbers was arrested as a flagrant offender by a police officer who was reported on the front of the above main point and was dispatched. During that process, the police officer’s name and resident registration number was the name and resident registration number of E, who was the person who sought to ask for his/her name and resident registration number.
In this way, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.
3. On August 2, 2017, the Defendant arrested flagrant offenders and transferred them to the Standing District of the Gwangju Western Police Station around 06:30 on August 2, 2017, and signed a letter of confirmation as to the process of arresting flagrant offenders and a letter of confirmation as to the suspect’s body confirmation as to the process of arresting flagrant offenders from police officers, and issued the letter of “E” to police officers.
In this way, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant has forged the signature of E without authority, and has exercised each forged signature of E.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's partial statement in the third protocol of trial;
1. As to the defendant and C, each.