The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-learning car.

On April 9, 2014, the Defendant driving the said car around 17:40, and driving the said car at a speed of about 34.2 km to 36.3 km per hour, depending on the two-lane roads in front of the member C in the Gyeonggi-si, the Gyeonggi-si, which are one-lane from the boundary of the news distance to the general market.

At the time, it is designated as a child protection zone, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to observe necessary measures and to drive less than 30 km per hour while paying attention to the safety of children.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, about 34.2 km to 36.3 km at the speed of speed, the victim D (the age of 9) who dried a crosswalk without violating pedestrian signal on the right side from the left side of the above folding passenger car, received the victim D (the age of 9) as the front part of the above folding passenger car, and made the victim go beyond the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim who needs to receive approximately 28 days of treatment due to the above occupational negligence, in a frame of the 5th part of the right side.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the occurrence of D traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for the request for a traffic accident report (1) (2) and for an appraisal report, booming of vehicles, diagnostic images, diagnostic documents, and verification request;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. A fine of three million won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (see, e.g., Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Code (see, e., the fact that the defendant reflects the mistake of the defendant, that the defendant has no criminal records, that the vehicle has purchased a comprehensive automobile insurance policy, that the victim's negligence is large, and that the degree of violation of the law by the defendant is not significant