A. The facts of recognition (1) Plaintiff A is a person who worked in D operated by the Defendant, and Plaintiff B is the husband of Plaintiff A.

(2) On January 14, 2012, at D factory work site around 10:30, Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as where Plaintiff A’s left hand hand hand over and stop hand over the pets and cut part of the hand hand over, while she was engaged in the work of cutting up two per ton of non-ferrous metals together with E at D factory work site.

(3) At the time of the accident (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”), Plaintiff A: (a) laid the string of the first non-ferrous metals into the machine stringer box, and (b) misunderstanding the stringer’s string of the second strings into the above stringer box; (c) caused the stringer’s string of the second stringer to the above stringer’s string; and (d) caused the instant accident to the winding along with the above stringer’s strings.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 5-7 evidence (including virtual number), witness E's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. (1) According to the above facts of recognition, although the defendant who employs the plaintiff A has a duty to take care of the plaintiff A to safely work at the workplace, he/she was negligent in failing to take such measures, such as misunderstanding the plaintiff A's water signal, who is another work worker, even though the work of the plaintiff A, which contains non-ferrous metal, is not completely finished, thereby causing a threat to the safety of the plaintiff A.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident in this case to the plaintiffs A and their husband B.

(2) However, without due care, the plaintiff A enters the upper east.