beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.10.24 2017고단1955

부정수표단속법위반

Text

Defendant

B Imprisonment for one year, and Defendant D, for six months, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B is a person who operates “F” in both weeks. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 20170, Dec. 1, 2017>

The defendant has been engaged in transactions by lending the current account table established in the name of C Co., Ltd. at the point south of G bank new branch.

On August 19, 2016, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number “H”, face value “F million won”, “the date of issuance,” and “I for the issuer’s representative director,” respectively, in the said F office’s name.

On November 21, 2016, the check holder was written in the indictment on November 21, 2016, which was within the time limit for presentation, but was corrected as it is apparent that it is a clerical error.

The above bank presented the above check payment.

However, from August 19, 2016 to September 19, 2016, the Defendant issued two copies of the check equivalent to the total face value of 59,600,000 won in total on two occasions, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table (1) from August 19, 2016 to September 19, 2016, and each of the following holders presented during the period for presentation, did not pay as a disposition of suspension of transaction against the head of the check in the above case.

Defendant B and Defendant B are actually operating an enterprise called “J”, and Defendant D had been working for a director at C Co., Ltd. and had been in charge of the management of the company, such as the supply of goods.

One is the friendship between people.

The Defendants were at the risk of being unable to pay the amount of the check on the date of presentation for payment with respect to two copies of the check, while Defendant B lent 10 copies of the check issued by Defendant B as the actual operator of C Co., Ltd. as the issuer, and Defendant D had the above C Co., Ltd.’s representative director I’s name and the corporate seal impression, and forged the above A’s accusation, etc., and then 2 copies of the check were altered.

. Making a false report;