However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant and the victim B are in conflict with each other in 2011, and the victim C and the victim B are now in conflict with each other.

1. Around 09:50 on August 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) opened a door to B around the Ma, 301 entrance, which is located in B’s residence; and (b) obstructed from the victim C; (c) “The victim shall be her head, her head, her head, and assaulted at one time on the left part of the victim’s hand.”

2. The Defendant destroyed and damaged property in addition to the entrance doors where the market price cannot be determined by inserting the entrance doors owned by the victim B on the grounds of the same date, time, and place as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Courses;