beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.10.29 2015고단4508

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:55 on August 13, 2015, the Defendant driven Ci30 cars from the roads front of the Daegu Southern-gu Office located in the Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, under the influence of alcohol content of 0.086%, to the roads front of the Defendant’s house located in the same Gu B.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident) are those engaged in driving of Ci30 automobiles.

At around 00:55 on August 13, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol as set forth in the foregoing paragraph 1, and driven the road of three-lanes in front of the Eelel in Daegu-gu, Nam-gu, the Defendant driven the said car from the south-gu, the south-gu, the direction toward the sphere distance.

At the time, there was an intersection in which signal lights were installed at night, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed to the person engaged in driving service and to keep the other vehicles' attitudes in the signal lights and the front door from the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was found to have been stopped by the victim F (the age of 38) who was driven by the victim F (the age of 38) due to the driving of a halog car, and was engaged in a sudden operation, but did not avoid this, but was in the front part of the said i30 vehicle, and was found to have been behind the halog car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as spawd spawds that require treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, the repair cost, such as the replacement of spawds, was 1,452,040 won to the extent that the next spawd car was damaged and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement by the police of F. F. The statement