If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On May 13, 2019, at around 00:15, the Defendant collected a 112 report from “C” in front of the border point of “C” located in Ssung City B, and made a statement that he was stolen of a bicycle at the site, and prepared a statement upon request from the above E and F, while preparing the statement, the Defendant himself “I will be fright, not suffering from damage. I will be frighted. I will be able to solve the bicycle? I will see how you lose the bicycle, she will be frighted at the left part of the F, once on the face, and fright at once.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. An act of spiting or spiting a police officer's face in order to assault a police officer dispatched by a defendant on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, and to feel insulting, etc., is not an act that interferes with the police officer's performance of duties.

However, considering the fact that the defendant was the first offender who has no record of punishment, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant, and the environment, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.