except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving CK5 vehicles.

around 11:04 on January 19, 2014, the Defendant driven the above taxi and sent to the first line of the third line of the third line of the Yayang-dong Yayang-dong Yayang-dong Yayang-dong Yayang-do, the Defendant turned to the third line of the third line of the third line.

At this point, the signal apparatus is installed and the left turn is designated to be displayed only at the time of the signal, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by making an internship in accordance with the signal apparatus signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, due to the occupational negligence committed by the U.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. A traffic accident report, a actual condition investigation report, and a diagnosis report;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1) (i.e., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da1448, Apr. 2, 2007)