A. The Seoul High Court substituted the conciliation of unjust enrichment cases 2015Na2067077.

A. The relevant Plaintiffs are the owners of the remainder of 1/2 shares in the instant house, who were the owners of the 1/2 share in the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and the 1/4 share in the instant house (hereinafter “instant house”), and the Defendant is the owners of the remainder of 1/2 shares in the instant house.

B. On June 13, 2015, E: (a) around the lease deposit of the instant house with F; (b) from July 15, 2005 to June 14, 2007, the lease deposit of the instant house was set at KRW 40,000,000 per month; and (c) from July 15, 2005 to June 14, 2007, E received the full rent of the instant house from F while maintaining the lease relationship with F and the instant house; and (d) after December 26, 2014, the Plaintiffs, who received 1/4 shares of the instant house from E, received the full rent of the instant house from F, to the effect that the Plaintiffs, G, and H, received the entire rent of the instant house from the lower court in lieu of the Plaintiffs, G, and H from July 13, 2015 to the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2015 to 205Ga540658, Jun. 26, 2015.

The plaintiffs shall jointly pay 68,300,000 won to the defendant, and 15,000,000 won as of the end of each month from August 2016 to the end of every five months (Provided, That 8,300,000 won for the last month) shall be paid in installments.

B. If the plaintiffs fail to pay the corresponding money at each of the above payment dates, they shall lose the benefit of the time, plus 15% interest per annum from the day following the loss of the remainder to the day of full payment.

2. The Plaintiffs are jointly organized.