However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant embezzled the fact that the amount of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the

1. The Defendant, in the middle of July 2016, up to KRW 300,00 won per page of the day he/she withdraws and delivers the proceeds of release on bail to the company selling on bail, in the vicinity of the Mapo-gu Seoul building in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

“In receipt of a proposal to the effect that “A bank account number (D) in the name of the accused is known to the person who has not been named, and the person who has not been named will lend money to the victim B at a closed place on July 12, 2016, at a low interest rate by raising the credit reputation point for the transfer of money to the account number known to him.

“The Defendant, by deceiving the victim to the effect that it was remitted KRW 15 million to the single bank account under the name of the Defendant, and the Defendant voluntarily used KRW 4.5 million, while keeping KRW 15 million in the single bank account under the name of the Defendant, for personal purposes, such as gambling funds.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the other's property while keeping it.

2. On August 8, 2016, the Defendant, in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, proposed to receive approximately KRW 2 million from the person in distress of his/her name on the road in front of the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo Building to receive approximately KRW 2 million, and sent the physical card, password, etc. in connection with the bank’s account (D) under the name of the Defendant, to the victim via Kwiksetset Service. On August 8, 2016, the person in default of his/her name would borrow a loan up to KRW 15 million to the victim E at a non-displace (i.e., the lending company) where he/she wired the funds to the victim at around August 8, 2016.

“A bank under the name of the Defendant by deceiving the victim to the effect that it is.