However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported on July 29, 2012 that “A” in front of a restaurant “C” located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, under the influence of alcohol on the street; and (b) was sent to the site by the Defendant, E (V, 35 years of age) who is the police officer belonging to the Sungnam-gu Police Station D police station, Sungnam-gu, who was a police officer assigned to the site; and (c) was able to ske and see the Defendant; and (d) recommended him to return home, and “I do not have a boomed drinking.”

C. Shosia, Shosia, Shosia

“.......” “F.........”

C. Whether there is a uniform and uniform entry into the police for the same period of time

The bath theory is called "the same year", and the bridge of the above E was walked several times to walk and take once as a drinking.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the victim's 112 report and the maintenance of public order, and at the same time, the defendant inflicted an injury on the left-hand spons, spons, spons, etc. which require three weeks treatment

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each photograph, statement of opinion, motion picture CD;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons of not less than Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;