The plaintiff is the market in C, and the defendant is a newspaper enterpriser and online newspaper enterpriser who reports comprehensive news via the Internet, etc.

On May 10, 2019, the Defendant published the article listed in attached Table 1 on the Internet homepage of the newspaper of this case as follows: ① the article listed in attached Table 1 as the title "E"; ② the article listed in attached Table 2 as the title "F"; ③ March 29, 2019 as the title "G"; ④ April 2, 2019 as the title "H"; and ④ the article listed in attached Table 4 as the title "Attachment 1 or 4 articles" (hereinafter referred to as "the article of this case").

The Defendant deleted the article 1 of this case on July 26, 2019.

[The grounds for recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 4, the summary of the plaintiff's argument of the overall purport of the pleadings, ① Among the article No. 1 of this case [The controversy is that the mayor of the city Council shall see the Si Council at the beginning level], [the City Council referred to as "A" to public officials at I at the last May 3, 190] (hereinafter "the first statement of this case")], ② Among the article No. 2 of this case, the two articles [A market "the same policy is different in progress," and only declared a de facto war to the City Council No. 1 of the City Council at the fourth (the President of the Special Committee on Budget and Accounts at the City Council at the beginning, and the article No. 4 of this case at the City Council at the end of March 27 and the article No. 1 of this case at the City Council at the end of March, 2007 and the article No. 3 of this case at the City Council at the end of March 28.