beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.17 2017고단4602

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who received the money from the victims in accordance with the direction of the staff of the Red Financial Fraud Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”), including the name and unsound “B,” and served as the role of delivering the money from the victims to other trillion staff. As a result, the Defendant promised to receive 1% of the daily amount of KRW 100,000 per day or the amount delivered, and conspired to receive money from the victims as well as the name and non-name scam scam scam staff.

1. At a place where the location of around June 19, 2017 cannot be known pursuant to the above offer where the victim E’s name is unknown, the singishing employee may obtain a loan by calling the victim E in return for “a loan to prevent the loan of Maspbook because there are too many loans, making too much loans to the victim E, thereby lowering the interest rate to make payment.”

“Along on June 20, 2017, 14,250,000 won was delivered from the bank account in the name of the victim to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of F on June 20, 2017 from the victim’s damage.

Since then on June 20, 2017, the Defendant would pay a fee to the Defendant in front of the exit 2nd time in Dobongcheon Station located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on June 20, 2017, prior to that time, from the aforementioned “D,” etc.

It received KRW 14,100,000 from the F who provided the account in question, out of the amount of damage that was withdrawn from the Saemaul Treasury account in the above F name.

2. On June 20, 2017, at the place where it is impossible to identify the fraud name of the victim G, the singishing employee also called the victim G while driving as if he was the prosecutorial investigator belonging to the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office, and calls to the victim G. “The large passbook opened due to the misappropriation of the name of the G C was used for the crime. Therefore, the transfer of the money in his account to the prosecutorial investigator would return the money to the prosecutorial investigator after confirming the crime relevance.

“Falsely speaking,” the victim at around 12:29 on June 20, 2017.