상해
All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: Defendant B (the remaining, the age of 35) and Defendant A (the age of 35) are married three years prior to the marriage, and they are currently in a divorce lawsuit.
A. Defendant B: (a) around October 20, 2016: (b) around 16:20 on October 20, 2016, Defendant C, 202 at Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si; (c) was in a place during which he had a director’s animals.
Although he wanted to carry an Ma and Matex sheet, he tried to get the victim from the victim A, biffed the victim by hand, biffed the victim by hand, and biffed the face of the victim by hand.
B. Defendant A, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, and at the time, at the victim B’s hand prevented the victim B from entering the room, was sleeping the victim’s arms and breath, and was flaped with hacks.
2. The determination may not be charged against the express intent of the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act as an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.
In such a case, the victims were present at this court on September 27, 2017, which was after the institution of the instant prosecution, and expressed that they do not want to be punished for each other. Thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.