However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

B and C invested 50,000,000 won in each of the five commercial sex acts establishments in the northwest-gu D Building in the five stories, and jointly run the said commercial sex acts establishments. The Defendant sought female employees from the broker, who is named the "F" as the head of the said commercial sex acts establishments, received the payment from the customers who have found the said commercial sex acts establishments, and guide them to the commercial sex acts place, and reported the sales status, etc. of the said commercial sex acts establishments to B.

In collusion with B and C, from August 2, 2015 to December 22, 2015, the Defendant employed female employees, such as G, who are born at the said sexual traffic establishment, including G, etc., and had female employees engage in sexual intercourse with the said female customers, after receiving from male guests one female employee, 140,000 won per time of sexual intercourse, 310,000 won for female employees, and 3.60,000 won for sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with B and C to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect B or C by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer concerning H, I, and female employees engaged in sexual traffic;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and selection of imprisonment;

1. The act of arranging sexual traffic for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is that the act of arranging sexual traffic for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is commercialized and harms the sound sexual culture and good morals. In light of the substance of the instant crime, the nature of the crime is not weak in light of the substance of the instant crime, the crime was committed in response to the continued request of the investigative agency after the control of the instant case, and was temporarily set aside until the arrest on November 30, 2017, and the Defendant was punished for the same crime around November 30, 201. Meanwhile, the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of the instant