except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 11:10 on July 20, 2018, the Defendant: (b) committed assault against the victim’s clothes and shoes brought about at the house of the victim C (nivers, 27 years old); (c) was tightly harming the victim; (d) was tightly harming the victim; and (e) was plucked by plucking up the victim’s knive hand; and (e) harming the right hand hand.

2. On July 20, 2018, at around 11:20 on July 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant was able to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender; (b) the circumstances leading up to the Seoul Western Police Station D District D District; (c) the police officer; and (d) the police officer, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report of 112 at the place specified in paragraph (1); and (c) stated that “the Defendant was able to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender; (d) the Defendant f and patrolman of the said horse F and G with the view of “the Defendant f and patrolman,” and (e) took a bath to “the Defendant, she will not only she will do so. I do so.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning G, E, C, and F;

1. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is as follows: (a) the Defendant seriously assaulted a female-friendly Gu in which he was dead; (b) the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties while assaulting several police officers dispatched therefrom; (c) there is no past record of criminal punishment prior to the instant case; (d) the Defendant has a profoundly reflected in the mistake; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and consequence of the crime; and (d) the circumstances after the crime,