To order the accused to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

피고인은 2017. 9. 27. 03:00 경 충남 서산시 B에 있는 C 대학교 D 부근 도로에서 충남 태안군 E에 있는 C 대학교 F 기숙사 앞 도로에 이르기까지, 피해자 G( 여, 22세 )를 포함한 직장 동료들과 대리 운전기사가 운전하는 H 투 싼 승용차에 승차해 이동하던 중, 다른 직장 동료들이 술에 취해 잠든 사이에 자신의 좌측에 앉아 있는 피해자를 보고 강제 추행할 것을 마음먹고, 피해자의 오른쪽 귀를 혀로 핥고 상의 위로 가슴을 만진 후 브래지어 속에 손을 넣어 가슴과 유두를 만져 피해자를 강제로 추행하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G and I;

1. 수사보고( 피해자가 제출 J 메시지 재출력) 유죄로 판단하는 이유 피고인은, ‘ 당시 차 안에서 술김에 피해자의 어깨, 목덜미, 팔을 잡기는 하였으나 공소사실과 같이 귀를 핥거나 가슴을 만진 사실은 없다 ’며 부인한다.

However, according to the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the facts charged are found guilty.

The statements made by the victim in line with the facts charged of the situation is consistent and concrete.

On the day of the instant case, the victim complained of the instant damages to the neighboring workplace members, such as I and K, and sent the message of resistance to the Defendant.

· The Defendant received contact from the victim on the day of the instant case and received a large number of hands to the victim on the following day.

A message sent to the effect that the school reports and receives disciplinary action or withdrawal from the school, “no one is available even if it is subject to any measure.”

The Defendant stated in the police that “the expected victims were broken down, embling, and shouldered,” and stated in the police that “the son was broken up with trees, arms, and shoulder.” The Defendant made a statement to the effect that he was sembling, selling, or shouldered.

L which sits on the left side of the victim's port side of the vehicle, and the Ma and the n which sits on the left side of the vehicle.