아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) clearly and consistently stated at the investigative agency and the court of original instance that the victim would have taken the victim's grandchildren at the time of the instant case, but the court below found the Defendant not guilty of all the primary and conjunctive charges of this case on the grounds that it is difficult to recognize the credibility of the victim's statement. Thus, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion
2. Summary of the facts charged in this case
A. The primary facts charged - The Defendant, from around 17:07 on October 24, 2014 to the river basin, asked the victim D (15 years old) who was prepared for the getting out of the river basin, and asked the victim "Is what he was" from the victim "Is the third grade of middle school," and then again, the victim "Is the victim "Is you want to see it. I will see that Is you will see it at the home where Is the hamber at the house to sath, we will see it, and "Is you will see it in the future, I will send the time to the sast's house," and "Is the victim's indecent act to the sast's house," and the victim "Is the victim's sath's refusal to do so."
B. Preliminary facts charged - The Defendant’s attempted minor abduction begins from the Suwon Station around 17:07 on October 24, 2014, asked the victim D (here, 15 years of age) who was prepared for getting off and getting out of the C Station to “Isle,” and asked the victim “Isle,” and then asked the victim “Isle, 3 years of age,” the victim “Isle, Isle, Isle, sager at the bar where I am sager was cut off.”
However, it is p.m.