beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2014.03.25 2013고단639

사문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who was aware of his knowledge, received the E driver’s license from the same high school line D in accordance with C’s guidance upon the Defendant’s request from the rental car company, and received the E driver’s license.

The Defendant used his driver’s license to borrow a vehicle from a siren company by concluding a vehicle lease contract in the name of E.

1. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On March 30, 2013, the Defendant presented a driver’s license to E in the name of the Commissioner of the former North Korean Police Agency in order to borrow vehicles from the office of “H” in the “H” office located in the “H” office located in the former North Korean Dos.

The Defendant: (a) stated the above G’s driver’s license as “E and Icele 102 Dong 102, Dong 102, Dong 102” in the column, such as the driver’s name, etc. of the vehicle rental contract; and (b) stated the above contract as E in the name of the State Party and the lessee column of the above contract; and (c) stated E’s signature on the next side to the said G.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the vehicle rental contract in the name of the above E, which is a private document on rights and obligations without authority, and exercised the forged private document.

B. On April 6, 2013, the Defendant, without authority, prepared a copy of the vehicle rental agreement in the name of the above E, a private document on the rights and obligations, at the said siren office, by the said method, and transferred it to the said G.

As a result, the Defendant forged one copy of the vehicle rental contract in the name of the above E, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, and used the forged private document.

C. On May 2, 2013, the Defendant, without authority, prepared a copy of the vehicle rental agreement in the name of the above E, a private document on the rights and obligations, at the said siren office, by the said method, and transferred it to the said G.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the vehicle rental contract under the above E, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, and is forged as such.