beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.08.14 2012가합1831

손해배상등

Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is the president who operates the “C”, which is a living facility for persons with severe disabilities, in the former North Korea-gun B. The Defendant Cultural Broadcasting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Cultural Broadcasting”)

(1) The term “MBC News Agency” is a public wave broadcasting company that produces and broadcasts programs such as “MBC News Agency”, “bC Broadcasting Round,” and “New News Round,” and Defendant AMBC (hereinafter “Defendant AMBC”).

(B) The news report 1) Defendant Culture Broadcasting posted digital content pertaining to Defendant Culture Broadcasting’s broadcast programs on the said website while operating the website “htp:/www.iMBC.com/com.” The title “E” from D 21:0 TV sets, and the title “F” from the 08:30 TV sets on the following day, as the title “G” from the news sets at 21:0 TV sets on the same day, and as the title “H” from 21:0 TV sets at 21:0 TV sets on the following day (hereinafter “208 news reports”).

2) Meanwhile, the Defendant Culture Broadcasting reported that the Government is promoting the amendment of the Social Welfare Act in the political sphere as the title of “J” at I 21:00 news media, and “The Government will make a Japanese survey on the human rights violations and operational status of the disabled facilities,” and made a report on the same contents in the news channel 06:00 on the following day, and appeared as the result of the non-interest of the disabled facilities even before four years of the draft of the Social Welfare Services Act. At this time, the Defendant Culture Broadcasting used the front door of the reporter “I will be able to pass through the National Assembly before the motion of the film is opened.” In this context, the government used the front door where C originals that had been reported in the year 2008 on the basis of their background (hereinafter “2011 report”).

When the report of 208 and the report of 2011 are referred to collectively, the case is referred to as "each."