업무상횡령
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant has embezzled the victim’s property as stated in the instant facts charged.
2. In full view of the following circumstances that can be acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① H and I made a statement in an investigative agency consistent with the facts charged, ② the above persons’ statements are consistent and specific; ② The Defendant made a confession of all the facts charged during the fourth trial of the court below, and there are no other circumstances to suspect the voluntariness of confession, and no other objective circumstances are acknowledged in the appellate court to reverse it, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.