However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is engaged in the operation of a village bus.

On September 2, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 00:50, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the obligation of front bank and right and right and right and right and the head of the victim D (the age of 54) crossing the vehicle at the front of the above vehicle, resulting in a serious injury to the victim, such as mathy due to the damage of the number of treatment days in front of the above vehicle, the judgment due to the damage of brain pansium, and the disability of recognition ability, etc. in front of the entrance of the fixed village, in accordance with the action in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 782.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. A complaint;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Each photograph;

1. A comprehensive analysis of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the reflection of the fact that the bus of the defendant is in conflict, the fact that the bus of the defendant is covered by the comprehensive automobile insurance, and the victim has committed an error of unauthorized crossing at night);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;