Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

[Reference Facts] On July 21, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 50,000 at the Busan District Court on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant was punished for a dispute due to around parking in around 2015 with the victim C (48 Sejong) who is a neighboring resident; and (b) the Defendant was ordered to file a complaint by the victim.

After that, on August 5, 2015, the victim received a decoration on the grounds that the victim caused the social controversy between neighbors by a dispute between neighboring fire stations of Busan Metropolitan City.

[Criminal facts]

1. Around May 16, 2016, the Defendant threatened the victim to the Busan Busan District Fire Station on May 16, 2016, on the alley of the victim’s house located in Suwon-gu, Busan, on May 16, 2016.

너 언젠가는 내가 징계 시키 삔다.

“Intimidating” the term “.

2. The Defendant’s intimidation and insult on June 28, 2016, when he was heard by the residents of the Dong at the same place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) around June 28, 2016, the victim’s defect “the phone to the company to which he belongs,” and the Defendant “in his workplace and continues to have been employed,”

The term "Madaman" means "Mada", "Madae, Madae, Madae Madae, Madae Magae Mara, Madae Mara", thereby threatening the victim and openly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report, recording notes and recording records of each recording;

1. Article 283 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 283(1) and 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the instant case (in particular, the background leading up to the repeated dispute situation of the Defendant and the victim, and the background leading up to the instant crime), the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, and other various sentencing factors indicated in the instant case, shall be comprehensively taken into account, and the judgment of not guilty of some facts charged as follows.