beta
(영문) 부산고등법원 2020.06.17 2020누20927

사업종류 변경 처분 등 취소청구의 소

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff and the defendant out of the total costs of the lawsuit after the filing of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is that the business type of the workplace of this case falls under the "business of putting in contact with or cutting in various metals" as stated in the table of the time of business type, and that the results of each fact inquiry about FFF corporation, G corporation, and D corporation prior to remand are dismissed, and the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed.

Paragraph 2 is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the judgment of Paragraph 2 is added with respect to the defendant's prior defense on the merits of the case, each of the dispositions of this case, "each of the dispositions of this case" in Sections 18 and 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 3, 18 and 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the judgment of Paragraph 2 is added. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the

A person shall be appointed.

D. After examining the appropriateness of the business type of the instant workplace based on the business contents, work process, facility status, organization of each person, field investigation, sales status, etc. of the instant workplace, the Defendant issued the instant disposition to change the business type of the instant workplace from January 14, 2018 to “Do retail and Consumer Products Repair Business” from “Do retail and Consumer Products Repair Business” to “the operation of various metals adjoining or a melting business” from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016, on the ground that the main business contents of the instant workplace constituted continuous mass supply of metal materials by continuously cutting them into a specific form under a contract with the previous industrial accident insurance premium rate, and notified the Plaintiff that the difference between the industrial accident insurance premium calculated according to the previous industrial accident insurance premium rate and the property difference determined according to the changed industrial accident insurance premium rate will be imposed as the additional industrial accident insurance premium. < Amended by Act No. 12183, Dec. 31, 2016>

Accordingly, the National Health Insurance Corporation issued the instant disposition imposing additional industrial accident insurance premiums to the Plaintiff on February 21, 2018, which notified the Plaintiff of KRW 48,013,460, and KRW 22,279,50 on March 21, 2018.