If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On January 10, 2017, at around 02:05, the Defendant: (a) called “C” in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul at around 02:05; (b) 112, the Seoul, a police officer, etc. belonging to the Seoul, who was used on the roads under the influence of alcohol, requested the Defendant to have her home and her home, and her home to board the patrol vehicle; and (c) her bath, such as “I have come to her governance, I have come to her house, I have come to her house, I have gone to her house, and came to go to the said E with the iron agents located in the said place, and she has gone to go to her home with the iron agents dives.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to Rabar-consor-consor-consoric photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions for criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act for the selection of punishment, and the selection of fines (influences, all of which constitute contingent crimes by drinking alcohol, and all of which have no record of criminal punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;