【Criminal Records】 The Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for the crime of forging private documents at the Seoul Eastern District Court on September 17, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 25, 2015.

【Criminal facts】 On August 10, 2011, the Defendant: (a) lent KRW 30 million to the victim’s “E” office at the victim D’s lending company (hereinafter “E”) located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Building 1806; (b) as of November 9, 201, the Defendant was currently living in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F apartment 308 Dong-dong 810; and (c) on November 7, 2012, the deposit amount of KRW 135 million can be returned as of November 7, 2012; and (d) the written lease contract is provided as security.

In addition, it made a false statement that Defendant G would provide the relevant power of attorney and promissory note when it provided the joint and several surety for the borrowed money.

However, the Defendant did not have obtained the consent of the joint and several guarantee of the borrowed money from G, and the delegated head under G name and the promissory note were forged and delivered to the victim, and the amount of debt at the time was over KRW 177 million in total, and the bonds interest rate was over KRW 28 million each month, and even if the bonds interest rate was over KRW 28 million, there was no intention or ability to change it within the third month.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired cash of KRW 30 million from the damaged person on the same place as the borrowed money.

around April 30, 2012, the Defendant of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ham-gu 213 [2018 Highest 213] around April 30, 2012, the Defendant would pay money borrowed by receiving deposit money from the victim I with a set of deposit money of KRW 100 million. The deposit money for the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit

“A false representation was made.”

However, at the time, the defendant did not provide the defendant with the security deposit, but received the return of the above security deposit.