The punishment of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, and one hundred thousand won of collection) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is a favorable factor for sentencing, such as the fact that the defendant does not repeat again while opposing his mistake, that the defendant seems to have actively cooperated with the investigation of accomplices after the confession of the crime, that the neighbors and family members of the defendant want to be able to support the defendant.

However, narcotics-related crimes are very serious in terms of social harm and risk of recidivism, and there are many criminal records and criminal records of the same kind, including imprisonment, for the accused, and in particular, the fact that the accused has repeatedly committed the crime of this case without any serious reflectivity even during the period of repeated crime of the same crime. The frequency and quantity of the accused's purchase or administration of chophonephones, various sentencing data shown in pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime, the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the accused, and the scope of the recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission (one year and six months to six months): Violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. [Determination of sentence] 2 types (math, marijuana, native Fath and item (c), etc. : Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than three years) [the scope of aggravated sentence] / [the scope of imprisonment with prison labor for not less than three years], the scope of aggravated punishment [the scope of imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one year and six years (one year to six (one year and six (one (6) years) years) years) years) years].