On August 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the victim D’s house located in Seosan-si, C Apartment 103, 810,000 won or more as the attorney’s appointment fee; (b) provided that “the husband of the victim would appoint an attorney-at-law with respect to the case of death of an automobile accident on July 24, 2012; (c) would have the victim paid the insurance money; and (d) provided that the victim agreed to do so would have 8.5 million won or more as the attorney’s fee to be paid; (d) used the Defendant’s agricultural account in cash 12 million won in August 201, 200; and (e) around August 29, 2012 as the Defendant’s agricultural bank account; and (e) used the Defendant’s embezzlement of KRW 148,00,000 or more as the aggregate for the purpose of storage of KRW 1481,000,000 for the same account.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by each prosecutor's office with respect to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each protocol of police statement concerning D;

1. In light of the fact that the relevant criminal facts have not been recovered from damage to the reason for sentencing under Article 355(1) of the Criminal Act, and that the nature of the crime is very poor, it is reasonable to sentence the sentence indicated in the order.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.