All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. Defendant 1) misunderstanding of facts on April 6, 2016, Defendant 1: (a) although the victim’s return to the victim C was drinking on April 6, 2016, the above victim’s return did not appear at the time of the above victim’s return; and (b) on the same day, there was no time when police officers Fbucks. Nevertheless, the lower court found Defendant guilty of this part of the charges; (c) the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment. (d) The lower court’s imprisonment with labor (10 months) was too unreasonable.

B. The above-mentioned sentence of the prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 피고인의 사실오인 주장에 대하여 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 피해자 C이 경찰에서 ‘피고인이 아무런 이유 없이 다가와 시비를 걸면서 왼쪽 주먹으로 목 부위와 귀 부위를 때렸다’라고 진술한 점, 경찰관 F도 경찰에서 ‘피고인을 체포하여 순찰차 뒷좌석에 태우고 경찰서로 호송한 다음 피고인을 순찰차에서 내리게 하는 과정에 피고인이 발로 허벅지 부위를 2회 찼다’라고 진술한 점, 위 각 진술내용에 모순되거나 객관적 사정에 반하는 부분이 없는 점 등에 비추어 보면, 피고인이 이 부분 공소사실 기재와 같이 피해자 C의 귀 부위 및 목 부위를 주먹으로 때렸고, 경찰관 F의 허벅지를 발로 2회 찬 사실을 충분히 인정할 수 있다.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

B. It is recognized that there are family members to support the defendant with respect to the allegation of unfair sentencing by the defendant and the prosecutor, and that there is no penalty on the defendant.

However, under the influence of alcohol, the crime of this case committed an assault against the victim C on the street without any special reason, and called out after receiving 112 reports, thereby committing an assault against the police officer F for arresting the defendant, and the victim I MT business.