However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the Pyeongtaek-si C Building around 00:43, the same shall apply to the case where “any woman is frighten and sound in a building, and the Defendant is frighten and short of sound in a building.”

“The” was demanded by the police officer E to disclose the personal information of the police box affiliated with the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station, which was called out after receiving 112 reports.

On the contrary, the Defendant against this police officer “ Dob Dob Dob Dob Dob Dob.”

Doz. Doz. Doz.

The flick, the flick out of the O, and the flick inside the flickbb, one of which is flick, and the flick in the month when the fine is imposed, shall be 00 million won.

“In doing so, the said police officer was threatened with drinking, and threatened the police officer as if he were.

In addition, the defendant may be arrested by the above police officer to interfere with the performance of official duties.

Although the police officer was given a warning, "I continue to know the police security department and the law, and therefore, I will interfere with the performance of official duties."

Sheeted, as inO andO, Hadne-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-

O Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz.

“The body of the police officer was tightly sealed by his hand, and threatened him as if he were spawned.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of reported cases and the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes of F, G and H;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Social Service Orders and the observation of protection;

1. The scope of punishment by sentence: Imprisonment for not more than five years;

1. Determination of types: One type interfering with the execution of public services;

1. Persons subject to special sentencing: None of them;

1. The scope of recommendations: Imprisonment with prison labor for six months - one year and four months;

1. A suspended sentence: Recognizing that the case is a contingent crime without being serious as a result of the occurrence;

1. Determination of sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months - two years - the aforementioned circumstances and conditions;