However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the Lone Star Cargo Vehicle B.

On September 3, 2017, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on September 18:17, 2017, and led the Defendant to drive the D Mart, “D Mart,” which is located in D Mart C in Gangwon-gun, from the side of the “Emart,” “in salary-hon city.”

At this point, it is a bend road with a central line. On the opposite lane, the victim E (58 tax) is driving, and the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to look at the front side and the left side, and to safely drive the vehicle and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the cargo vehicle in front of the vehicle driving by the Defendant with the negligence of breaking the central line.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim E, such as sugars without any wound in the two open fields where approximately two weeks of treatment is required, and the Defendant suffered injury to G (V, 51 years of age) who is a passenger of the said high-speed car, such as salt, tensions, etc. for about two weeks of treatment. The Defendant suffered injury to H (V, 64 years of age) who is a passenger of the said cargo vehicle, for approximately two weeks of treatment, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, from the same passenger I (54 years of age), to the same passenger I (54 years of age), for approximately two weeks of treatment, and from the same passenger J (V, 72 years of age), about the left-hand side of the said passenger in need of approximately 13 weeks of treatment, and suffered injury, such as dumbing dumnas, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Investigation reports (on-site situations, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of penalty;