도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence (6 million won in penalty) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unhued and unfair.
2. In light of the following: (a) there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the lower court’s determination; and (b) there are various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and pleadings, the lower court’s punishment seems unfair. Therefore, the Prosecutor’s aforementioned assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below (Article 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act on the 3th, 5, and 6th, the part of the judgment below’s “Article 148 and 54(1) of the former Road Traffic Act” is a clerical error in the “Article 148 and 54(1) of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 14356, Dec. 2, 2016). Thus, it is obvious that the prosecutor’s appeal is a clerical error in the “Article 25(1) of the Regulations on the Criminal Procedure.”