2. In full view of the following circumstances, the lower court’s sentence imposed on the Defendant does not seem to be unreasonable, and thus, it does not accept the Defendant’s assertion, inasmuch as it appears that the lower court’s sentence was unreasonable, in view of the following circumstances.

The scope of the recommended sentence in the sentencing guidelines falls within the scope of a repeated crime. The punishment prescribed by the lower court appears to have taken into account all favorable circumstances for the Defendant, and there is no change in the circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in the sentencing after the sentence of the lower court is rendered. 3. The Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and thus, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.