except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 22:40 on March 20, 2020, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving a car B Q900, driven the front road of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government along the five-lane distance from the SihungIC to the Guro Digital Complex.

At that time, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed in the front section, so the defendant engaged in the driving of motor vehicles had a duty of care to maintain the direction and proper distance of the motor vehicle and to safely proceed by accurately manipulating the steering signal and the flow of the motor vehicle in good manner.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to maintain the safety distance and failed to stop immediately before driving the front part of the foregoing vehicle, and went away without taking necessary measures, such as providing rescue to the victim, even though he received a part of the victim D (Seoul, 56-year-old driving EK5, which was stopped for the signal atmosphere, and received a part of the victim EK5, and received approximately two weeks of light tensions and tensions for the above victim, and at the same time, damaged the above K5 vehicles to bring about KRW 695,946 for repair costs, and failed to stop immediately and stop the vehicle to rescue the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report, on-site photograph (Evidence Nos. 8 and 10 of the evidence list), statement (D), investigation report (verification of a damaged vehicle);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (victim's diagnostic report, etc.), written estimate, and written diagnosis;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of failing to take measures after the accident);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: the defendant involved in the accident after the accident in this case.