On May 2013, the Defendant proposed that “I would like to report the flag's flag's flag's flag's flag's flag's flag's flag's flag's flag's flag's flag's flag's flag's flag, and agreed

From that time to July 2013, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 5,00 from 3,00 per hour to Ga, H, and I for a place of use; (b) obtained 5,00 won from 3,00 won to 52 card each time; (c) divided the first card into four card for each individual participant; (d) the number and pattern are different; (e) the number and pattern are different; and (e) the number of card holder is a winner; and (e) the card may be exchanged three times for each game; and (e) the Defendant divided the first card into three cards to Gabbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, J, K, and L;

1. An interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police protocol of statement of M, I, N, andO;

1. Although the defendant was found to have opened a gambling house E and he did not open the gambling house, the defendant's statements made by E, J, K, and L are consistent and specific since it had been since the investigation agency to this court, and it is judged that the defendant's statements made by M, I, N, andO, which correspond to the defendant's defense room, are not reliable as follows, and the defendant's statements made by M, I, N, andO, which are consistent with the defendant's defense room, can be sufficiently recognized in light of each evidence in the judgment, so the above defense room is rejected.