At around 21:15 on July 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) heard the 112 report of the case of assaulting D by the Defendant, and the police officer affiliated with the E box called the Defendant to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender after hearing D’s statement, etc.; (b) followed the police officer in the way of assaulting the Defendant, such as “the date of death of the Defendant on the day, the knife, the knife, the knife, and the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, and the knife, the knife, the knife.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in charge of 112 reports and investigation affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of a sentence, sentence sentencing is to be imposed by a defendant who has been sentenced to a suspended sentence due to a traffic accident caused by a drunk driving, and the crime in this case is committed under the influence of one hundred thousand days, with multiple fines or criminal records of suspended sentence due to violent crimes, and upon confirmation of