In other words, it is thought that the defendant interfered with the job seeking of the defendant, and therefore, the victim and the victim suffered a debt from the victim, thereby getting the victim's loss from his liability, and caused the victim's injury such as the heat of a knife that requires treatment for about two weeks.

2. The summary of the defendant's assertion that the defendant and his defense counsel are in dispute with the victim, or there is a fact that the defendant had taken the defendant on the floor by subtracting the defendant's debts from the victim, but there is no fact that the defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim by deducting the victim's debts from the knife part.

3. According to the victim’s consistent statement from the investigative agency of the victim that the damaged person suffered an injury by knife with the Defendant’s debt knife part, flife with knife with flife with the Defendant, and the victim’s medical certificate of injury that he/she received from D inside and outside on August 9, 2017 the left knife with knife with knife with knife with knife with knife with knife with knife

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt that the Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as the victim’s left eye, flick, or flick, as stated in the facts charged, to the extent that there is no room for deliberation.

It is difficult to see it.

(a) The victim was on board a joint ship at the time of the instant case at the investigative agency;

E, F, G, and H have observed the criminal scene of the defendant.