국가유공자비해당결정처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On April 2, 1979, the Plaintiff entered the Army, and was discharged from the military service on January 14, 1982 with the maturity of the hospital.
B. On December 27, 2010, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that he/she received the diagnosis and treatment of “the escape certificate of a conical signboard” due to the continuous construction work of a place where he/she had been mobilized in the military base for two to three months each day, and that he/she had been mobilized in the establishment cost of this establishment work, and transferred the 50 to 60 meters wide (46 km) to his/her body, and that he/she was in a group with one shoulder and one shoulder.
다. 피고는, 병상일지 상 입대 1년 4개월경에 진단받은 것으로 확인되는 ‘만성 요부염좌’가 공무와 관련되어 발병하였음이 인정된다 하더라도, 염좌는 관절의 골절이나 인대손상 없이 가볍게 삔 상태로 그 증상이 일시적이며 단기간의 치료로 치유 가능하고, 일상생활에 장애를 남기지 않는다는 전문의의 의학적 소견이 확인되고, 병상일지상 확인되는 ‘(의증)요추간판 탈출증(L4-5)'은 확진 병명이 아닌 점 등을 종합적으로 감안할 때 위 질환이 군 공무수행으로 인하여 상당 악화된 것으로 인정하기 어려워 위 신청 상이부위에 공무상 상이가 인정되지 않는다는 이유로, 2011. 7. 13. 원고에 대하여 국가유공자 요건 비해당 결정처분(이하 ’이 사건 처분‘이라 한다)을 하였다.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 2-1, 2, Eul evidence No. 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff asserted that there was no open source prior to the entry of the military branch, and that there was no open source even after the entry of the military branch. However, in 1979, the Plaintiff began with the establishment of a bridge in the middle of the 1979, and the construction of a luxa and a luxa.