However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who operates a typology with the trade name "C" in Seoul Mapo-gu building B and the second floor, and the victim D (the victim, the 37 years of age, the tentative person) is a student who operates a typology at the typol.

On June 24, 2018, at around 19:30 on June 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) laid down the arms of the victim who was engaged in a tree at the relevant selhouse; (b) laid down the victim’s left chest, cut off the victim’s knee; (c) laid down the victim’s body on the part of the victim; (d) took off the victim’s body; and (e) took off the victim’s body; and (e) forced the victim’s chest into the victim’s body; and (e) took down the victim’s chest, she frighted into the victim’s chest, she frighted, frighted, and was raped; but (e) attempted to take rape the victim’s chest, and frighted into an attempted sexual intercourse to resist the victim’s body by making the victim fright and pushed down.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to materials submitted by the male or female-gu of the victim);

1. Articles 300 and 297 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 25 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of attempted crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes;

1. Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from an order to disclose or notify information; Article 49(1) proviso of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse; Article 50(1) proviso of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse; Article 50(1) proviso of the Act provides that the Defendant has no record of having been sentenced to the same kind of crime or imprisonment or heavier punishment prior to the instant crime; the Defendant’s personal information registration and participation in the sexual assault treatment course can be seen to a certain extent to prevent recidivism; the Defendant’s disadvantage due to disclosure or notification order