However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 8, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million to a person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving), a fine of KRW 5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Dangerous Driving), a fine of KRW 2 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Dangerous Driving) at the same court on January 7, 2014, and a fine of KRW 3 million at the same court on July 1, 2014 and violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

On November 23, 2014, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license on November 23, 2014, driven Lone Star or Gohap in the section of approximately 4 km from the front of a dkm apartment located in Pyeongtaek-si dong in Pyeongtaek-si dong in a state of alcohol alcohol concentration of 0.126%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control results of drinking driving, and report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Copies of the car driving license register;

1. Records before judgment: Application of inquiries about criminal records, etc. and copies of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant's strict punishment is necessary in light of the fact that the defendant, for the reasons of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, drives a motor vehicle without a license in a considerable drinking state despite three times of the same kind of drinking driving skills, especially the defendant continuously committed drinking and driving without a license since 2012. However, the defendant recognized the facts charged in the case of this case, made the defendant not to drive a motor vehicle against his mistake, and made the defendant not to drive a motor vehicle again. The defendant's error is identical to the defendant.